I was just wondering that Google might have designed the page rank system based on the premise that higher the links a site has from other sites, higher would be the traffic to that site. However, I see so many sites that are having a very high page rank (since they might be having links from so many other sites) but do not have a very good volume of traffic. Also doesn't this system undermine the importance of good and relevant content on your site? Again I have seen so many sites which do not have a very good content and also might be having wrong grammar in their content, but still those are ranked by google. Please share your thoughts on this.
I guess PR has some value along with SERP, but the latter is more important because this is useful when people do searches for information and your site appears on the first page.
Relevant contents and keywords are the more important things that play the major role during optimization. A page with a page ranking of 9 or even 10 will never rank for irrelevant keywords. The entire aim of SEO is to develop a source of targeted traffic.
For me PR is not important i never gives priority to PR even i see that Google is also not giving priority to PR for SERP. If you can generate good quality backlink than you can get your position in SERP.
befor Search Engine Result Page rank dependent basicly from PR, but now noone knows, beacause google seems to change the algorithm
There is nothing true.
To find out - look for this:
"website promotion articles by shulman"
Is Google Page Rank Really Relevant?
Linear Mode
